首页> 外文OA文献 >Traumatic extra-axial hemorrhage: correlation of postmortem MSCT, MRI, and forensic-pathological findings
【2h】

Traumatic extra-axial hemorrhage: correlation of postmortem MSCT, MRI, and forensic-pathological findings

机译:外伤性轴外出血:死后MSCT,MRI和法医病理结果的相关性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of in situ postmortem multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of primary traumatic extra-axial hemorrhage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty forensic neurotrauma cases and 10 nontraumatic controls who underwent both in situ postmortem cranial MSCT and MR imaging before autopsy were retrospectively reviewed. Both imaging modalities were analyzed in view of their accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity concerning the detection of extra-axial hemorrhage. Statistical significance was calculated using the McNemar test. kappa values for interobserver agreement were calculated for extra-axial hemorrhage types and to quantify the agreement between both modalities as well as MRI, CT, and forensics, respectively. RESULTS: Analysis of the detection of hemorrhagic localizations showed an accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 89%, 82%, and 92% using CT, and 90%, 83%, and 94% using MRI, respectively. MRI was more sensitive than CT in the detection of subarachnoid hemorrhagic localizations (P = 0.001), whereas no significant difference resulted from the detection of epidural and subdural hemorrhagic findings (P = 0.248 and P = 0.104, respectively). Interobserver agreement for all extra-axial hemorrhage types was substantial (CT kappa = 0.76; MRI kappa = 0.77). The agreement of both modalitites was almost perfect (readers 1 and 2 kappa = 0.88). CONCLUSION: CT and MRI are of comparable potential as forensic diagnostic tools for traumatic extra-axial hemorrhage. Not only of forensic, but also of clinical interest is the observation that most thin blood layers escape the radiological evaluation.
机译:目的:评估原位尸体多层计算机断层扫描(MSCT)和磁共振成像(MRI)在原发性外伤性轴外出血中的诊断准确性。材料与方法:回顾性分析了30例法医神经外伤病例和10例非创伤性对照,这些患者在尸检前均进行了死后颅内MSCT和MR成像检查。考虑到它们的准确性,敏感性和关于轴外出血的检测特异性,对这两种成像方式进行了分析。使用McNemar检验计算统计显着性。计算轴外出血类型的观察者之间一致性的kapp值,并分别量化两种方式以及MRI,CT和法医之间的一致性。结果:对出血部位的检测分析表明,使用CT的准确性,敏感性和特异性分别为89%,82%和92%,而使用MRI的准确性,敏感性和特异性分别为90%,83%和94%。 MRI对蛛网膜下腔出血定位的敏感性比CT敏感(P = 0.001),而对硬膜外和硬膜下出血的发现无明显差异(分别为P = 0.248和P = 0.104)。所有轴向外出血类型的观察者相互同意率很高(CT kappa = 0.76; MRI kappa = 0.77)。两种模态的一致性都几乎是完美的(阅读器1和2的kappa = 0.88)。结论:CT和MRI具有与创伤性轴外出血法医诊断工具相当的潜力。观察到大多数薄血层都逃脱了放射学评估,这不仅具有法医学意义,而且具有临床意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号